In what situations might a security officer need to use force?

The correct choice points to the principle of using force as a last resort, specifically when there is an imminent threat of harm to oneself or others. Security officers are trained to assess situations carefully and to prioritize de-escalation techniques before considering the use of force.

In instances where there is a direct and immediate threat, such as an assault or any situation that could lead to serious injury, a security officer may need to intervene physically to protect themselves or others. This understanding aligns with legal and ethical standards governing the use of force, emphasizing that it must be proportionate and necessary in response to the level of threat.

The rationale for this choice is rooted in the idea that security officers are primarily tasked with maintaining safety and order, and the use of force should never be arbitrary or excessive. Other situations, such as verbal disagreements or the simple enforcement of rules, do not typically meet the criteria for justifying the use of force, highlighting the importance of assessing the context and urgency of the threat.