Which statement is true regarding non-peace officers using force?

The correct choice highlights that non-peace officers, such as security officers, can use force only if they are acting at the direction of a peace officer. This is aligned with the legal framework governing the use of force, which generally stipulates that non-peace officers have limited authority in situations requiring the use of force.

In many jurisdictions, security personnel are given specific guidelines that restrict their actions. They typically do not possess the same authority as law enforcement officers and must adhere to legal limits on the use of force. When acting under the direction of a peace officer, a security officer may be able to justify the use of force within those specified boundaries. This ensures that their actions are supported by law and align with the ongoing law enforcement efforts.

The other statements are less aligned with legal standards governing non-peace officers. For instance, the prohibition of never using deadly force is often context-dependent, and certain circumstances where they could act defensively may exist. Also, the requirement to always retreat is not an established rule for non-peace officers, as this can vary based on the perceived threat and local laws. Similarly, exercising discretion in any situation can lead to misuse of authority and is not a blanket policy for non-peace officers, as their actions must